Opinion / Liu Shinan
Help rural students get education
By Liu Shinan (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-07-19 06:33
Two farmers in Shanxi Province committed suicide recently, both because
they could not afford their children's college fees, according to Chinese
media reports on Monday.
In recent years, reports of similar tragedies have appeared every year
around the time universities and colleges enrol new students. Many
farmers say that one of the things they "fear most" now is their
children's success in the national college entrance exam, as that means
they will have to spend almost their entire annual income on tuition
fees. Ironically, Chinese farmers place their biggest hope for a change
in their circumstances on their children receiving a college education.
China's universities scrapped free education in 1989. Last year, annual
tuition fees rose to an average of 5,000 yuan (US$625). However, this
does not include the costs of meals, books and other daily necessities.
According to the latest official statistics, Chinese farmers have an
average annual income of 3,256 yuan (US$407). Tuition fees are also a
heavy burden on urbanites, whose average annual income is 10,493 yuan
(US$1,312).
After 17 years, Chinese people have become accustomed to universities
charging tuition fees. They realize that higher education is a high-end
commodity like a villa or a car. However, they do question how the
tuition fees are set and whether they are justified.
A vice-minister of education explained last year that the calculation of
the cost of each university student's education is based on the "normal
costs of daily operation" of the university, while noting that the
"actual cost" is much higher. The calculated cost was 10,000-14,000 yuan
(US$1,250-1,750). Then, the official said, a median is adopted and
divided by four to arrive at the official tuition standard of 3,500 yuan
(US$437.5). Last year, the ministry issued a notice stating that no
university should be allowed to charge tuition fees higher than 6,000
yuan (US$750).
I have two questions about this theory. First, is higher education purely
a market commodity? Second, is the aforementioned method of calculation
fair to farmers?
Higher education is not completely comparable to villas and sedan cars.
It is actually a quasi-public resource, because it constitutes part of
the nation's strength and concerns the overall quality of Chinese
society. A country can survive without villas and sedan cars but cannot
do without higher education. Therefore, the government should not hand
over the responsibility of providing higher education completely to the
market.
Though the Chinese Government bears the major part of the costs of
running universities, it is an indisputable fact that these institutions
have gone too far in turning themselves into profit generators by
charging more than the State-stipulated standard tuition fee, as well as
extra fees under various guises.
My second question concerns the method of calculating the "normal costs"
of higher education, which, according to the education authorities,
comprises the salaries of the teaching staff, social security, pensions,
management and the daily operation of the institution. As all
universities and colleges are in cities, these costs are calculated
according to urban standards. This method of calculation therefore
discriminates against farmers.
It is commonly acknowledged that the urban-rural income gap mainly stems
from the inequitable trade between industrial and agricultural products.
Therefore, it is unfair for farmers to pay tuition fees at the same rate
as their urban cousins.
This urban-rural income gap also existed in the pre-reform years.
However, this inequity did not affect higher education as it was free to
everybody at that time. Now that we have to pay for higher education,
most farmers are effectively denied access to our universities and
colleges. This is unfair.
Such an imbalance may have to exist for some time, but it should not be
an excuse to prevent farmers from enjoying equal access to higher
education.
The government should subsidize college students from rural families.
Email: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn
(China Daily 07/19/2006 page4)
Hot Talks
� N. Korea launches 6 Missiles
� Taiwan's (Irrational) Fear of China
� Former US Treasury Secretary says dump T-Bills
� MC'DONALDS + SINOPEC = FUBAI
� Share Our Crafts: Naming contest
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
Alibaba is the largest B2B marketplace in the world. Source model ship,
wooden puzzle, one-piece toilet, RC hovercraft, photo album, prom dress,
pocket bike, Vaginal Speculum, Samurai Sword, String Panty and PVC Pipe.
Learn Chinese, Chinese Mandarin, Learning Materials, Mandarin audio lessons, Chinese writing lessons, Chinese vocabulary lists, About chinese characters, News in Chinese, Go to China, Travel to China, Study in China, Teach in China, Dictionaries, Learn Chinese Painting, Your name in Chinese, Chinese calligraphy, Chinese songs, Chinese proverbs, Chinese poetry, Chinese tattoo, Beijing 2008 Olympics, Mandarin Phrasebook, Chinese editor, Pinyin editor, China Travel, Travel to Beijing, Travel to Tibet

No comments:
Post a Comment